Vince, the proof is in the typography. The shapes of the letters. Also, as we'll see on the Decalogue Stone, a pattern of errors in the letters that show it was copied from a modern Hebrew Bible. The example I keep coming back to is if you had a document, and the parchment was ancient, it was found in an archive in Philadelphia, and the wording sounded plausible for 1776 . . . but the letters are shaped like the font "Comic Sans" . . . at some point you stop trying to figure out how this amazing coincidence happened that a scribe started drawing letters exactly like a 2000 typeface, and you ask "why would someone create a document and insert it into this archive for someone to think it's old?" Because the lettering being in a format that's entirely modern isn't a coincidence. And you'll note most supporters of the Decalogue Stone will quickly concede the Keystone is a modern object; even Dr. Altman said it was probably something accidentally left by a Jewish tinker or trader recently. The problem is the Keystone and Decalogue Stone rise or fall together, and they most definitely fall -- as ancient artifacts -- but they're of interest because there was an honorable intention at work in 1860 that justified the amount of work they put into creating and hiding them.
Oh the Blatant scientific and research misconduct is when BRAD LEPPER did not report the Newark holy stones in his article about the stone mound they were found under !
Jeff : empirical proof is needed. That is just hearsay you are calling typography. You haven’t identified any empirical evidence. How they wrote the letters is not empirical proof it’s only opinion
Falsification, in its simplest terms, means to make something false or to misrepresent something. It's the act of altering or changing information to deceive or mislead. This can involve anything from fabricating evidence in a legal case to changing data in a scientific experiment.
Here's a more detailed breakdown:
1. In a scientific context:
Falsifiability:
In science, falsifiability refers to the ability of a theory or hypothesis to be tested and potentially proven false. A theory is considered scientific if it can be refuted by empirical evidence.
Falsification of data:
This involves altering or omitting data to support a desired outcome, such as a particular hypothesis or conclusion. It can also include manipulating research equipment or processes.
2. In legal or academic contexts:
Falsification of evidence:
This is a serious offense where documents, statements, or other evidence are changed or forged to deceive.
Falsification of records:
This can involve altering academic records, financial records, or other official documents.
3. In general:
Falsification of history:
This refers to the distortion or alteration of historical events or records.
Self-falsification:
This occurs when someone makes a statement that contradicts itself, like the Liar's Paradox.
Examples of Falsification:
Changing grades on a report card to make them appear better.
Forging a signature on a document.
Altering data in a scientific experiment to support a particular hypothesis.
Writing a false excuse note for an absence.
Fabricating evidence includes making a false narrative.
Vince, the proof is in the typography. The shapes of the letters. Also, as we'll see on the Decalogue Stone, a pattern of errors in the letters that show it was copied from a modern Hebrew Bible. The example I keep coming back to is if you had a document, and the parchment was ancient, it was found in an archive in Philadelphia, and the wording sounded plausible for 1776 . . . but the letters are shaped like the font "Comic Sans" . . . at some point you stop trying to figure out how this amazing coincidence happened that a scribe started drawing letters exactly like a 2000 typeface, and you ask "why would someone create a document and insert it into this archive for someone to think it's old?" Because the lettering being in a format that's entirely modern isn't a coincidence. And you'll note most supporters of the Decalogue Stone will quickly concede the Keystone is a modern object; even Dr. Altman said it was probably something accidentally left by a Jewish tinker or trader recently. The problem is the Keystone and Decalogue Stone rise or fall together, and they most definitely fall -- as ancient artifacts -- but they're of interest because there was an honorable intention at work in 1860 that justified the amount of work they put into creating and hiding them.
Still waiting for some proof and not just allegations. "Allege" is a funny word to be aligned with "professionals." What do they go to school for?
"to assert or declare something without proof."
People pay these idiots to allege things?
Then when proof is given.. it's a hoax!
Oh the Blatant scientific and research misconduct is when BRAD LEPPER did not report the Newark holy stones in his article about the stone mound they were found under !
Jeff : empirical proof is needed. That is just hearsay you are calling typography. You haven’t identified any empirical evidence. How they wrote the letters is not empirical proof it’s only opinion
Did you ever consider Wyrick got fed up with Falsification, also
Known as scientific misconduct, due to Falsely being accused of forgery? This is not mentioned in your blatant attempt to confound the public.
This is what Jeff and Brad are doing here:
Falsification, in its simplest terms, means to make something false or to misrepresent something. It's the act of altering or changing information to deceive or mislead. This can involve anything from fabricating evidence in a legal case to changing data in a scientific experiment.
Here's a more detailed breakdown:
1. In a scientific context:
Falsifiability:
In science, falsifiability refers to the ability of a theory or hypothesis to be tested and potentially proven false. A theory is considered scientific if it can be refuted by empirical evidence.
Falsification of data:
This involves altering or omitting data to support a desired outcome, such as a particular hypothesis or conclusion. It can also include manipulating research equipment or processes.
2. In legal or academic contexts:
Falsification of evidence:
This is a serious offense where documents, statements, or other evidence are changed or forged to deceive.
Falsification of records:
This can involve altering academic records, financial records, or other official documents.
3. In general:
Falsification of history:
This refers to the distortion or alteration of historical events or records.
Self-falsification:
This occurs when someone makes a statement that contradicts itself, like the Liar's Paradox.
Examples of Falsification:
Changing grades on a report card to make them appear better.
Forging a signature on a document.
Altering data in a scientific experiment to support a particular hypothesis.
Writing a false excuse note for an absence.
Fabricating evidence includes making a false narrative.